Pet Supplies
Frequent Tearing Issues
Petkin Doo-Over Poop Bag Dispenser with Bags, 240 count, Unscented
3.1
/10
Quality
2.0
Value
3.5
Design
3.0
Function
3.5
Durability
2.0
In a Nutshell
- Bags frequently tear and rip during use.
- User should preemptively double-bag to contain waste.
- Economical and convenient for the most part.
Quick Verdict
These poop bags are fairly functional but fragile, often ripping during use.
Quick Stats
Reviews Analyzed
9
Would Recommend
44%
Would Buy Again
20%
Avg Lifespan
Approximately 3 months
Pet Compatibility
🐕
Dogs
Suitable
🐈
Cats
Caution
Pros & Cons
Pros
-
Affordable Price (2)
The product is budget-friendly
Cons
-
Thin, Fragile Bags (4) major
The bags frequently tear and rip
-
Not Durable (4) major
Bags are easily torn and fragile
Tip: Double-bagging the poop bags
-
Would not order again (4) major
Mostly negative statements
Tip: use double bags instead
Who Is This For?
✓ Best For
- • Budget-conscious pet owners — The product is economical for the quantity provided
✗ Skip If
- • Those seeking durable poop bags — Bags are often too thin and prone to tearing
Durability & Care
Expected Lifespan
Up to 240 uses
Factors: Double-bagging, Frequency of use, Handling and care
Cleaning Methods
✗
Machine wash
✗
Hand wash
✓
Spot clean
Care Tips from Users
- 💡 Avoid double-handed gripping to prevent tearing.
- 💡 Handle with care
Floor Compatibility
✓
Hardwood
✓
Tile
✓
Carpet
✓
Vinyl
✓
Laminate
Rating Distribution
3.6
9 reviews
5★
33%
4★
33%
3★
22%
2★
0%
1★
11%
affordable (2)
convenient (1)
tattered (6)
not buying again (3)
Common Questions
Are these bags durable?
No, many users report the bags tearing easily and quickly.
Can I pick up poo in multiple uses?
Buyers need to preemptively double-bag
Highlighted Reviews
— Karen
"Good option for a necessary item."
— Linda
"Not very strong. The first time I used one of these bags, my hand went right through it! What good is that when you're picking up poop?"
Bottom Line
Generally decent for the price, but be prepared for frequent rips and double-bagging due to thin material.
3.1
/10
—
Below Average