Dog Treats Quality Concerns Trending Down
Barkworthies Beef Scapula Grain-Free Dog Treats, 2 count

Barkworthies Beef Scapula Grain-Free Dog Treats, 2 count

By Barkworthies 3 reviews analyzed Updated Oct 2023 70% confidence
1.7 /10
Quality
1.0
Value
2.0
Design
1.0
Function
1.0
Durability
1.0

In a Nutshell

  • Inconsistent sizing in different bags
  • Feeling of being cheated
  • Poor value for money

Quick Verdict

Customers are disappointed with the inconsistent size of the treats and feel they do not get their money's worth. There are significant issues with the size variation and overall value.

Quick Stats

Reviews Analyzed 3
Would Recommend 0%
Would Buy Again 0%

Pet Compatibility

🐕 Dogs
Suitable
🐈 Cats
Caution

Critical Warnings

critical

Inconsistent sizing and poor value for money.

Prevention: Enforce quality control measures for consistent product sizing.

Pros & Cons

Pros

Cons

  • Inconsistent Sizing (3) critical

    Customers received bags with treats of varying sizes, much smaller than expected.

  • Poor Value for Money (3) major

    Customers feel they are not getting enough product for the price.

    Tip: Adjust pricing based on size consistency.

Who Is This For?

Best For

Skip If

  • Cost-conscious buyers — Inconsistent size and poor value for money.
  • Picky eaters — Customers report issues with treat size and quality.

Durability & Care

Expected Lifespan Varies

Cleaning Methods

Machine wash
Hand wash
Spot clean

Floor Compatibility

⚠️ Hardwood
⚠️ Tile
⚠️ Carpet
⚠️ Vinyl
⚠️ Laminate

Rating Distribution

1.3
3 reviews
5★
0%
4★
0%
3★
0%
2★
33%
1★
67%
inconsistent sizing (3) poor value (3)

Highlighted Reviews

""

— Grey

"I ordered a few bags of these. One had two scapulas that were a little smaller than my hand- about the same size at the pet store. The other bags contained scapulas that were 1/2 to 1/4 that size. If they were priced by weight it would be annoying but fine. But I don't see how getting half the produ..."

Bottom Line

Avoid this product due to significant issues with size consistency and poor value for money.

1.7 /10
Poor