QualityConcerns Trending Down
Ware Small Animal Eye Bowl

Ware Small Animal Eye Bowl

2 reviews analyzed Updated Oct 2023 50% confidence
2.0 /10
Quality
2.0
Value
1.0
Design
3.0
Function
2.0
Durability
1.0

In a Nutshell

  • Product arrives broken due to poor packaging.
  • Design flaws make it difficult for small animals to eat.
  • Not worth the investment.

Quick Verdict

The Ware Small Animal Eye Bowl has significant issues with durability and design. It arrives broken due to poor packaging and is not suitable for small animals due to its design flaws.

Quick Stats

Reviews Analyzed 2
Would Recommend 0%
Would Buy Again 0%

Pet Compatibility

🐕 Dogs
Caution
🐈 Cats
Caution

Critical Warnings

critical

Product arrives broken

Prevention: Better packaging required

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Does Not Tip (1)

    The bowl does not tip over, which is a positive feature.

Cons

  • Arrives Broken (1) critical

    The product arrived broken due to poor packaging, poor packaging both times of delivery.

  • Difficult to Access Food (1) major

    The lid area is too high, making it difficult for small animals to access their food.

Quality Trend: Declining

Recent reviews mention issues with durability and packaging excusa making

Older Reviews Said:

Neutral

Newer Reviews Say:

Negative

Who Is This For?

Best For

  • Small Animal Owners — Pet food accessories.

Skip If

Durability & Care

Expected Lifespan Varies

Cleaning Methods

Machine wash
Hand wash
Spot clean

Floor Compatibility

⚠️ Hardwood
⚠️ Tile
⚠️ Carpet
⚠️ Vinyl
⚠️ Laminate

Rating Distribution

2.0
2 reviews
5★
0%
4★
0%
3★
50%
2★
0%
1★
50%
poor packaging (1) difficult to use (1)

Common Questions

What happens in delivery?

Product was delivered with poor packaging and hence it was damaged

Highlighted Reviews

""

— Clara

"They shipped it twice without any bubble wrap or protective packaging so broke both times. Not worth it because it will most definitely arrive broken."

Bottom Line

Given the issues with durability, we do not recommend this product. Consider alternatives that offer better packaging and design for small animals.

2.0 /10
Poor