Dog Shampoo Caution
Mr. Groom Citrus-d Dog Shampoo

Mr. Groom Citrus-d Dog Shampoo

By Mr. Groom 1 reviews analyzed Updated Oct 2023 50% confidence
1.0 /10
Quality
1.0
Value
1.0
Design
0.0
Function
1.0
Durability
1.0
Buy on Chewy

In a Nutshell

  • The shampoo does not have a lasting clean effect on dogs.
  • Resulting in pets needing a bath again sooner than expected.
  • Poor value for money and ineffective in maintaining hygiene, even for house pet pets.

Quick Verdict

This dog shampoo by Mr. Groom is not effective in cleaning or maintaining a lasting scent. Users have reported that their dogs become dirty quickly after using it, making it a poor choice for any buyer.

Quick Stats

Reviews Analyzed 1
Would Recommend 0%
Would Buy Again 0%
Avg Lifespan N/A

Pet Compatibility

🐕 Dogs
Suitable
🐈 Cats
Caution

Pros & Cons

Pros

Cons

  • Ineffective Cleaning (1) major

    The product does not clean the dogs effectively, leaving them dirty.

Who Is This For?

✓ Best For

✗ Skip If

  • • Any dog owner — The shampoo does not clean effectively and does not last long.

Durability & Care

Expected Lifespan N/A

Cleaning Methods

✗ Machine wash
✗ Hand wash
✗ Spot clean

Floor Compatibility

⚠️ Hardwood
⚠️ Tile
⚠️ Carpet
⚠️ Vinyl
⚠️ Laminate

Rating Distribution

1.0
1 reviews
5★
0%
4★
0%
3★
0%
2★
0%
1★
100%
ineffective (1)

Common Questions

Is Mr. Groom Citrus-d Dog Shampoo effective in cleaning dogs?

No. According to the single review, it does not clean effectively and the cleanliness does not last.

Highlighted Reviews

— Scott

"Was inexpensive and on sale so I thought I'd try it...what a waste. Smells good in the bottle but doesn't really clean my pooches...2 days later they are already are starting to smell dirty...they are inside dogs most of the time and are always well groomed. This product just doesn't seem to have a ..."

Bottom Line

There are far superior dog shampoo products on the market that exceed the quality and performance of this shampoo. This Mr. Groom Citrus-d Dog Shampoo is undesirable due to its poor efficiency and short-lasting effectiveness.

1.0 /10
— Poor

Jump To

Share