Pet Food Quality Concerns Editor's Choice
Scratch and Peck Feeds Organic Chicken & Duck Feed 16% Layer Mash

Scratch and Peck Feeds Organic Chicken & Duck Feed 16% Layer Mash

By Scratch and Peck Feeds 9 reviews analyzed Updated Oct 2023 85% confidence
7.8 /10
Quality
7.0
Value
7.5
Design
7.0
Function
8.0
Durability
7.0

In a Nutshell

  • Organic and nutritious feed for chickens and ducks
  • Praise for taste and health benefits
  • Inconsistent quality with occasional contamination
  • Versatile use with fermentation options

Quick Verdict

The Scratch and Peck Feeds Organic Chicken & Duck Feed 16% Layer Mash is generally highly praised for its quality and the nutritional benefits it offers to hens. However, there are occasional complaints about inconsistent quality and the presence of unwanted particles in the feed. Overall, it is a good choice for those looking to provide high-quality, organic feed to their chickens.

Quick Stats

Reviews Analyzed 9
Would Recommend 78%
Would Buy Again 78%
Avg Lifespan 4 months

Pet Compatibility

🐕 Dogs
Caution
🐈 Cats
Caution

Critical Warnings

high

Occasional batches may contain unwanted particles and excess powder

Prevention: Increase vigilance in checking product quality upon delivery and decide if quality is acceptable with time correlated with proper satisfaction

critical

Feed not suitable for dogs and cats

high

Ensure feed is not contaminated with mold or pests before feeding to chickens

Prevention: Store in a cool, dry place

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • High Nutrition (4)

    Feed provides excellent nutritional content.

  • Organic and Health (3)

    Feed is organic and non-GMO

  • Taste Appeal (4)

    Chickens love the taste

  • Versatile Use (2)

    Can be soaked, sprouted, or fermented

  • Egg Quality Improvement (2)

    Users report improved egg quality

  • Easy Transition (1)

    Chickens easily transition to this feed

Cons

  • Quality Inconsistency (3) major

    Occasional batches contain unwanted particles and excess powder

  • Price (2) minor

    Considered expensive by some users

  • Small Particle Size (1) minor

    Some users dislike the fine particle size

  • Inconsistent Formulation (1) major

    Changes in ingredients over time

Quality Trend: Declining

Recent reviews mention occasional batches with unwanted particles and powder, affecting overall quality.

Older Reviews Said:

positive

Newer Reviews Say:

mixed

Who Is This For?

Best For

  • Chicken farmers looking for organic, high-quality feed — Provides excellent nutrition and taste appeal for chickens, improving egg quality.
  • Owners of picky eaters — Even picky chickens enjoy this feed, ensuring they get proper nutrition.

Skip If

  • Budget-conscious buyers — Feed is considered expensive by some users, especially when bought locally.
  • Those who prefer consistent feed formulation — Occasional changes in ingredients may affect the feed's value and reliability.

Durability & Care

Expected Lifespan 3 to 5 months

Factors: Storage conditions, Handling and spillage, Fermentation practices

Cleaning Methods

Machine wash
Hand wash
Spot clean

Care Tips from Users

  • 💡 Store in a cool, dry place to maintain quality
  • 💡 Use airtight containers for long-term storage
  • 💡 Avoid direct sunlight exposure

Floor Compatibility

Hardwood
Tile
⚠️ Carpet
Vinyl
Laminate

Rating Distribution

4.3
9 reviews
5★
67%
4★
0%
3★
0%
2★
0%
1★
33%
organic (2) high-quality (4) taste (4) inconsistent quality (3) powder issues (3) price (2)

Common Questions

How do individual bags differ from batch to batch?

There have been reported inconsistencies in the quality of individual bags, with some containing unwanted particles and excess powder.

Is it suitable for other poultry besides chickens and ducks?

Feeding to other types of birds (pigeons, quails, etc.) is not directly mentioned in the reviewed data.

Highlighted Reviews

— Angela 1 found helpful

"Best feed yet"

— Deborah

"I have ordered this many times"

Bottom Line

For those looking for an organic, nutritious feed, this product is generally recommended. However, buyers should be aware of potential quality inconsistencies and consider this a trade-off for the overall benefits.

7.8 /10
Good