Pet Treats Trending Down
Emerald Pet Little Chewzzies Salmon Recipe Chicken-Free Dog Treats

Emerald Pet Little Chewzzies Salmon Recipe Chicken-Free Dog Treats

By Emerald Pet 8 reviews analyzed Updated Jan 2024 90% confidence
3.7 /10
Quality
3.5
Value
3.0
Design
5.0
Function
4.0
Durability
2.0

In a Nutshell

  • Chicken-free recipe
  • Size too small for large breeds
  • Dental issues reported due to hardness

Quick Verdict

The Emerald Pet Little Chewzzies Salmon Recipe Dog Treats receive mixed reviews. While some dogs enjoy them, there are significant issues with size and durability. Many customers report that the treats are too tough, leading to dental issues for pets. The treats are considered too small for large breeds and not as soft as expected. Some customers miss the original formulation.

Quick Stats

Reviews Analyzed 8
Would Recommend 22%
Would Buy Again 0%
Avg Lifespan 1 week

Pet Compatibility

🐕 Dogs
Suitable
🐈 Cats
Suitable

Critical Warnings

critical

The treats are too hard and have caused dental issues in some dogs.

Prevention: Consider softer treats and monitor pets for dental issues

high

The treats are too small for larger breeds, posing a choking hazard.

Prevention: Use caution or opt for a different treat size for large breeds.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Chicken-free (1)

    The treat is chicken-free, making it suitable for dogs with chicken allergies.

  • Can break into smaller pieces (2)

    Users appreciate that the treats can be broken into smaller pieces for training purposes.

  • Pauses chewing behavior (1)

    The treats encourage dogs to pause and chew, potentially aiding in digestion.

  • Small size (1)

    The small size makes them ideal for small dogs or for use as training treats.

Cons

  • Size too small (2) major

    The treats are too small for larger breeds, making them inconvenient and potentially hazardous if ingested whole.

  • Too hard (3) critical

    The treats are too hard and have caused dental issues in some dogs.

  • Not soft (2) major

    The treats are not soft as expected, making them unsuitable for training or as a chewy snack.

  • Not as good as original (1) major

    Customers prefer the original formulation and are disappointed with the new recipe.

Quality Trend: Declining

The recent reviews indicate a decline in quality compared to the original formulation.

Older Reviews Said:

neutral

Newer Reviews Say:

negative

Who Is This For?

Best For

  • Small dog owners — The size of the treats is suitable for small dogs.

Skip If

  • Large breed owners — The treats are too small and hard, posing a risk to large breeds.

Durability & Care

Expected Lifespan 1 week

Factors: Hardness of treats, Size of pet, Frequency of use

Cleaning Methods

Machine wash
Hand wash
Spot clean

Care Tips from Users

  • 💡 Store in a cool, dry place
  • 💡 Use as directed

Rating Distribution

2.6
8 reviews
5★
38%
4★
0%
3★
0%
2★
38%
1★
24%
hardness (3) size (2) not soft (2)

Bottom Line

If you have a small dog and are looking for a chicken-free treat, these might be worth trying. However, if you have a large breed or are specifically looking for soft, easy-to-chew treats, consider looking elsewhere or opting for the original formulation if it's still available. The concerns about dental health and size make these treats a riskier choice.

3.7 /10
Below Average